Thursday, March 01, 2007

Looking for hot girl-on-girl action? Check the Weekender

Other than former TL editor Allison Walzer's litigation, not much going on. If you're interested in some girl-on-girl action or other skin, check out the galleries toward the bottom of the Weekender page.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Slow news day for you guys?

Anonymous said...

"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son."
-- Dean Wormer

But it's the entire demographic of "The Weekender."

Anonymous said...

Nice to see Connor bringing the paper down to the level of Girls Gone Wild.

Anonymous said...

Jesus Christ, what is your idea of fun 9:26? Would you rather the Weekender publish stories about nuns and priests. The fucking Weekender is not for news, but just what the title says. So why you are sitting home watching Animal House on a Friday night, two girls are getting it on. If your a man or a woman, do yourself a fucking favor. Get laid or bet up. Both will help you.
And to 9:28, that picture is very tame compared to Girls Gone Wild footage.
But you also must be sitting home watching Animal House, probably jerking off over your pathetic days in college.
Go fuck yourself, lesbo hater!

Anonymous said...

Gee, 10:39, you assume any two women kissing MUST be lesbians? Who's the bigot here?

Anonymous said...

Now that's what I'm talking 'bout! luv the pic.

Anonymous said...

This photo is even classier - really kicks it up a notch.

http://www.timesleader.com/images/timesleader/weekender/16691/278597675281.gif

Anonymous said...

You can never have enough girl on girl photos. More!

Anonymous said...

"bet up" is a local usage that really should not be used in written form. i have not heard this anywhere else in america.

Anonymous said...

I posted at 9:26PM, and I'd just like to thank 10:39PM for proving my point for me.

"Your" obviously brighter than I am.

Tom Carten said...

Maybe they're eating a Snickers bar.

Anonymous said...

If they were eating a "Snickers bar," there would be a man in the photo.

;)

Anonymous said...

I counted a whole two variations of one picture. Whoopee