This happened with his W-B party column - published in the paper on Sunday, online on Tuesday. Maybe he's a believer in embargoing online content for a few days until everyone can read the print edition? In any case, it's a must-read. Here's the short version:
1. Readers don't care who owns the paper.
2. The subscribers of the paper, all 60,000 (huh?) of them, own the paper in Rich's mind.
3. Who owns the paper isn't important.
He doesn't say how much the subscriber-owners get if he sells out.
4 comments:
As one of the "owners," I would like to know who the other owners are - but not the ones who inhereted the paper - the ones who paid money for it.
Wow, what a load of shit.
Does he really believe the people who read that are that stupid?
That column was insulting.
NOTE: He also hints at eventually selling the place - not a good column to admit to that in. What a stupid prick.
Rich Connor was a cocksucker 20 years ago. The only difference today is that he's a bigger one.
To anonymous poster 11:30 p.m.: Too bad the "cocksucker" has more money then you will ever see in your life. Don't hate just because you're jealous.
Post a Comment